“You’re a strategic planning consultant? You must use Drucker’s Five Most Important Questions a lot.”
Sinking feeling. As I stood by the grill with a beer in my hand at a recent summer party, I couldn’t come up with even one of his apparently essential strategic questions
I mentioned some of the business thinkers we often draw on, like Jim Collins and Peter Block. My new friend nodded politely, but I was clearly speaking to a Drucker man. He told me how Drucker’s business frameworks had guided his successful career as a manager. How they were now helping him transform the effectiveness of the nonprofit board he served on.
I was eager to learn more when I got back to the office. Amazon is taking its sweet time delivering Drucker’s book, but in the meantime here are Drucker’s Five Most Important Questions You Will Ever Ask Your Nonprofit Organization:
What is your mission?
Who is your customer?
What does your customer value?
What are your results?
What is your plan?
These are all questions we ask and answer in the course of strategic planning with our clients, although not in Drucker’s specific terms.
For instance, the word “customer” was once a refreshing shock to nonprofit sensibilities, a challenge to those who automatically disdained commerce and marketing. Later on, calling donors and clients “customers” became a cliché. When a useful term becomes a buzzword, it shuts down the good thinking it once may have stimulated.
But it’s been a while since Drucker’s heyday and “customer” seems to have dropped out of frequent use in the nonprofit world. So, maybe it’s time to bring the “customer” back into our strategic discussions.
In any case, I’m glad to be challenged to learn more about the amazing Peter Drucker and I’m looking forward to learning more about his Five Questions.
If we “stress test” this strategic plan – borrowing the idea from banking, how would recent decisions our organization made align with this plan?”
Stress testing is a simulation used to test how banks will fare against a series of scenarios. During our planning process, our committee explored future shifts. The suggestion of looking backward against recent decisions was well-received.
What followed was a robust and thoughtful Read more
- A compelling vision of change. First and foremost, of how the world, your community will be different.
- The way. While setting an inspirational and meaningful goal is critical, without articulating your path to that goal you’ll not really being strategic, are you?
- The will. While plans are more than paper and the planning process itself should unleash new understanding and meaning, you have to believe enough in what you’ve committed to to start acting on your strategy in all you do.
- Leadership. This may or may not be a proverb, but I love this saying “the community goat starves to death.” Someone has to take ownership of the plan to move it forward. Hopefully, that’s your board. And your CEO. And each and every person in the organization.
- Courage. You’ve probably made some big stretches in your plan. To quote Francis Perkins:
“Most of man’s problems upon this planet, in the long history of the race, have been met and solved either partially or as a whole by experiment based on common sense and carried out with courage.”
If you are starting your strategic planning, here are a few other tips for you:
What is it that nonprofits want or need from grant makers?
At the very top, I put:
# 1: Flexible, unrestricted operating funds.
According to the most recent data from The Foundation Center, only 23% of foundation grants go to general support.
#2: Long-term donor investment
Every organization has to re-raise every dollar it receives each year. Having a reliable source of funding can improve stability and planning (though for some nonprofits, it can make them very lazy).
#3: Other wants/needs
- Larger donations that make a significant difference.
- Gifts that deliver a high return on investment in time and direct costs.
- Response to rapid change or emergency community needs.
- Leadership development: A mismatch between organization needs and its people can sink an organization. Sometimes, changes need to be made. Other times, investment in leadership development can make a different. Areas for investment on my list include self-knowledge, managerial and leadership skills, technical expertise in administration, human resources, fund development, program development, etc. (This is an investment in the whole sector as leaders switch organizations).
Too rarely does a mission statement confidently offer up its promise of betterment for its community.
Don’t get bogged down in all the stuff you do. You don’t need to throw the kitchen sink at your mission statement.
Kevin Starr of the Mulago Foundation threw down a mission challenge in “The Eight Word Mission Statement” in the September 18, 2012 Stanford Social Innovation Review. The eight words: “a verb, a target population, and an outcome that implies something to measure.”
I agree that “razor-sharp” clarity about where you are going enables you to be strategic, adaptable and clear on where you are heading. That’s why I’m such a stickler for developing a clear theory of change/logic model and include its development into the strategic plans I work on. Plus, I learned long ago, that having a theory of change and logic model upped Read more
The Audubon Society of Rhode Island (Audubon) has long had a three-part agenda that included Conservation, Education and Advocacy.
But why? Why those three strategies? How did they fit together? How do they produce the change that Audubon is trying to achieve in Rhode Island?
We ask questions like these routinely in our strategy work with our clients. We find that developing a logic model is the perfect way to answer these questions.
What’s a logic model?
The logic model is a graphic representation of your core hypothesis: “if we do this, then that will happen.” It’s the path that you have chosen to get from point A to point B.
You can develop a logic model for your entire organization, for a department, even for a specific project you are undertaking. Let me change that last sentence. You should develop a logic model ….
Why should? Because whether you admit it or not, you are carrying a logic model in your head that guides your action. But if you don’t put it down where everyone can see it, can dissect it, can test it, you could all be working from different change theories or even none at all (as in “we’ve always done it that way”).
The framework you are using should have some research-based evidence that it will produce the results you are looking for. But if it doesn’t, if it is experimental based on your local knowledge, or intentionally contradicts the established wisdom, then you owe it to all of us and your clients to let us know the whys of what you are doing and to collect the evidence that what you are doing is working.
If you’ve done any government grant seeking, you’ve probably been asked to include the logic model for your program. Before you start complaining how confused you get by the difference between outcomes and outputs, in our strategic planning we use a simplified model that is focused on your theory of change – or why it is that you have any confidence at all that the path you are on is going to get you to the results you are hoping for.
Here’s the example from the Audubon Society of Rhode Island example (thank you to Executive Director Larry Taft for letting us share this with you). Just click on the image to enlarge:
To achieve that end, the path Audubon had taken was three fold:
1. Conserve natural habitats, by owning refuges directly or supporting regulations or other actions that would protect them.
2. Enable personal stewardship, by helping people make choices in their lives that support sustainability, including critical political and financial support.
3. Advocate for public policy that protects ecosystems and reinforces personal choices.
As a leading environmental organization, Audubon is also frequently asked to take up all kinds of projects. Because they can all see the why behind the work they do – staff, board, members, supporters – choices and priorities are clear.
Here’s some other reading about logic models:
Reflection questions for the year past:
What did we think was impossible this year, but accomplished anyway? What made it possible?
Of all that we accomplished, what makes us most proud? Why is that important to us?
What question was I asked in 2013 that was so powerful I couldn’t stop thinking about it? Why?
The bottom line: “93% of successful organizations report that strategic planning has ‘some to critical impact’ on overall success, whereas only 48% of low success organizations report such impact.” Association for Strategic Planning
At the center of strategic planning is the commitment to community outcomes or mission-based objectives. These objectives are backed up by a clear-headed understanding of the dynamics of the world you exist in, a thoughtful and evidence-based strategy for executing programs (or an experiment that you’ll learn from) and a plan for building the operational capacity and strategic partnerships that are your best shot at reaching those objectives.
If ever there was a book that could help improve strategic planning, it’s Decisive, How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work.
According to the book, our usual process looks like this:
- We encounter a choice.
- We analyze our options.
- We make a choice.
- Then we live with it.
This sounds logical and familiar. Most of us would pat ourselves on the back for being so rational.
The problem, as the Heath’s point out, is that there is a fatal flaw at each stage:
- Narrow framing makes us miss other options when we encounter a choice.
- Confirmation bias makes us gather self-serving information.
- Short term emotions often tempt us into making the wrong choice.
- We’re overconfident about how the future will unfold and stick to one path once we’ve made our choice.
Luckily, the Heath’s suggest four strategies to counteract your biases. They sum them up in the acronym, WRAP: Read more